Pentagon Paid $998,798 to Ship Two 19-Cent Washers (Update3)
By Tony Capaccio
Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) -- A small South Carolina parts supplier collected about $20.5 million over six years from the Pentagon for fraudulent shipping costs, including $998,798 for sending two 19-cent washers to an Army base in Texas, U.S. officials said.
The company also billed and was paid $455,009 to ship three machine screws costing $1.31 each to Marines in Habbaniyah, Iraq, and $293,451 to ship an 89-cent split washer to Patrick Air Force Base in Cape Canaveral, Florida, Pentagon records show.
The owners of C&D Distributors in Lexington, South Carolina -- twin sisters -- exploited a flaw in an automated Defense Department purchasing system: bills for shipping to combat areas or U.S. bases that were labeled ``priority'' were usually paid automatically, said Cynthia Stroot, a Pentagon investigator.
C&D and two of its officials were barred in December from receiving federal contracts. Today, a federal judge in Columbia, South Carolina, accepted the guilty plea of the company and one sister, Charlene Corley, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to launder money, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin McDonald said.
Corley, 46, was fined $750,000. She faces a maximum prison sentence of 20 years on each count and will be sentenced soon, McDonald said in a telephone interview from Columbia. Stroot said her sibling died last year.
Corley didn't immediately return a phone message left on her answering machine at her office in Lexington. Her attorney, Gregory Harris, didn't immediately return a phone call placed to his office in Columbia.
`Got More Aggressive'
C&D's fraudulent billing started in 2000, Stroot, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service's chief agent in Raleigh, North Carolina, said in an interview. ``As time went on they got more aggressive in the amounts they put in.''
The price the military paid for each item shipped rarely reached $100 and totaled just $68,000 over the six years in contrast to the $20.5 million paid for shipping, she said.
``The majority, if not all of these parts, were going to high-priority, conflict areas -- that's why they got paid,'' Stroot said. If the item was earmarked ``priority,'' destined for the military in Iraq, Afghanistan or certain other locations, ``there was no oversight.''
Scheme Detected
The scheme unraveled in September after a purchasing agent noticed a bill for shipping two more 19-cent washers: $969,000. That order was rejected and a review turned up the $998,798 payment earlier that month for shipping two 19-cent washers to Fort Bliss, Texas, Stroot said.
The Pentagon's Defense Logistics Agency orders millions of parts a year. ``These shipping claims were processed automatically to streamline the re-supply of items to combat troops in Iraq and Afghanistan,'' the Justice Department said in a press release announcing today's verdict.
Stroot said the logistics agency and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, which pays contractors, have made major changes, including thorough evaluations of the priciest shipping charges.
Dawn Dearden, a spokeswoman for the logistics agency, said finance and procurement officials immediately examined all billing records. Stroot said the review showed that fraudulent billing is ``not a widespread problem.''
``C&D was a rogue contractor,'' Stroot said. While other questionable billing has been uncovered, nothing came close to C&D's, she said. The next-highest billing for questionable costs totaled $2 million, she said.
Stroot said the Pentagon hopes to recoup most of the $20.5 million by auctioning homes, beach property, jewelry and ``high- end automobiles'' that the sisters spent the money on.
``They took a lot of vacations,'' she said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Tony Capaccio at acapaccio@bloomberg.net .
Last Updated: August 16, 2007 15:16 EDT
Friday, August 17, 2007
Pentagon auditors uncover overbilling "scheme"
HA HA HA H!!!! I think to call this a scheme gives these sisters a little more credit than they are due. From the article here it sounds like the whole thing happened due to a rather ugly and shortsighted flaw in the payment system in use at the pentagon; automatic processing of purchasing requests. Nothing terribly complicated or clever about that. It likely developed like this, one fateful day while entering PO's into the computer a simple mistake was made (the wrong amount was entered) and lo and behold the order went through the system without any problems. Then these devious "schemers" started thinking, "hmmm maybe I should try entering a slightly larger request and see if that works".. Sooner or later your billing the govt a million dollars to ship wood screws to Baghdad, I could see how that may have happened.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
Response to Multiut - Nachshon Draiman rebuttle about his fraud – rev.
Nachshon Draiuman - Multiut Corp. Fraud
You will note that State and Federal Court records in llinois and elsewhere are replete with lawsuits, judgments and wrongdoing by Nachshon Draiman and his companies. Causing the death of patients in the Nursing homes and a lawsuit by the State of Illinois and conviction People v. Gurell – Nachshon Draiman (1983), 98 Ill.2d 194, 207, 74 Ill.Dec. 516, 456 N.E.2d 18.). abusing nursing home patients see State of Illinois records.
Multiut Corp and Nachshon Draiman dba Future Associate of Skokie, IL. are withholding evidence of fraudulent activities in the Energy industry and inflated Medicaid billing to the government for Nursing Home patients. Also Bank fraud against their bank by presenting fraudulent and inflated receivable reports in order to get and keep a credit line, Nachshon Draiman was a large stock holder of the bank. Draiman Nachshon • SC 13G • Success Bancshares Inc • On 2/17/98
Filed On 2/17/98 • SEC File 5-53545 • Accession Number 950137-98-586
Just because he was able to cheat the system with political contributions and expired statute of limitations does not make him any less guilty.
Everything stated previouly by me against Nachshon Draiman, Multiut, Future Associates and his Nursing Homes can be very easily verified.
Where there is smoke - there is fire.
Several courts and administrative bodies have found Nachshon Draiman culpable in providing fraudulent documents and the intentional abuse and negligence of Nursing Homes patients in Illinois – in every case Nachshon tried to blame others for his misdeeds. See People of the State of Illinois vs. Gurell, Nachshon Draiman et al – 456 N.E.2d 18 there has been numerous patient abuse and deaths due to that abuse. In 127 Ill.App.3d 1165, 483 N.E.2d 731, 91 Ill.Dec. 385 Sonnenberg v. Mill View Associates, Nachshon Draiman where millions of dollars had to be paid as damages for abuse and death of a patient, not to mention numerous patients who died falling down an elevator shaft.
Nachshon Draiman former partner from Lydia Healthcare Arnold Simenson will testify that Nachshon has been breaking and entering and stealing his personal financial records which is recorded on video tape. Nachshon therefore lost his ownership interest in that home. Numerous Nursing Homes operated by Nachshon Draiman have been closed down by the State due to abuse and deaths of patients – Numerous judgments are entered against Nachshon Draiman’s entities for overcharges. Not to mention the over 20 litigations that are currently pending. (Such as Dynegy v Nachshon Draiman w 6 contempt of court orders – Multiut, Israel Discount Bank vs. Nachshon Draiman, State Financial Bank vs. Nachshon Draiman and others). Inflated gas bill to his own nursing home and his friends and associates in order to increase the expenses and bill Medicaid fraudulently
Not to mentioned that he is represented by a Law Firm with attorneys who pleaded guilty to criminal conduct with Jack Abramoff as one of the partners – to say the least and has numerous ethical and criminal transgressions (Greenberg Traurig).
PS – THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
States: “All men are created equal” I state (except those with money, power and influence – who are more equal than others)
NEWSMEAT - NACHSHON DRAIMAN's federal campaign contribution search ...NACHSHON DRAIMAN » IL » 60077 ... Receive an alert every time new records are added to this search for NACHSHON DRAIMAN. Your Email ...
Political Campaign Contributors415777. Paulette Dragul ... Contribution Count/Amount - 1 / $2000 415778. Nachshon Draiman ... Contribution
Count/Amount - 2 / $2000 415779. ...
Dynegy Mkg & Trade v. Multiut Corp, Nachshon Draiman et al 1:02-cv-07446.
Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois -
Case Title: Dynegy Mkg & Trade v. Multiut Corp, Nachshon Draiman et al
Case Number: 1:02-cv-07446
Judge: Hon. John A. Nordberg
Filed On: 10/16/2002
128 01/10/2005 MINUTE ORDER of 1/10/05 by Honorable Michael T. Mason : As stated on the reverse of this order, plaintiff's motion to compel financial documents [124-1] and for sanctions is granted in part and denied in part. [124-2] Defendant's request for reconsideration is denied. (See reverse of minute order.) Notices mailed by judge's staff (hp) (Entered: 01/10/2005)
Multiut Nachshon Draiman lawsuits
2001-CH-19688
GORE JACK MULTIUT CORPORATION 11/20/2001
2002-CH-21586
KSJ CORPORATION TAM FITNESS TENNIS CLUB/ Nachshon Draiman 12/02/2002
2007-L-006471
MADDY MELISSA ADAIR THOMAS, Nachshon Draiman 06/22/2007
2006-L-005786
COWANS ISABELLE BURNHAM HEALTHCARE PROPER, Nachshon Draiman 06/02/2006
2004-L-013384
FEDDELER VIRGINIA PETERSON PARK HEALTH CARE, Nachshon Draiman 11/29/2004
2004-L-008129
STATE FINANCIAL BANK EMBASSY CARE ASSOCIATES, Nachshon Draiman 07/20/2004
2004-L-000663
ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK LTD DRAIMAN NACHSHON Z 01/20/2004
2006-M1-129654
WEIS DUBROCK DOODY DRAIMAN NACHSHON 04/19/2006
1987-M1-168987
ILLINOIS PUBLIC AI DRAIMAN NACHSON D 09/09/1987
Case Number Plaintiff Defendant Date Filed
2004-M2-001804
LUBIN ROBERT MULTIUT CORPORATIO 08/02/2004
2004-M1-134094
MCCLURE WILLIAM MULTIUT 06/02/2004
1999-M2-000227
RABIN SCOTT R MULTIUT CORP 01/28/1999
Dynegy Mkg & Trade v. Multiut Corp, Nachshon Draiman et al 1:02-cv-07446.
Draiman and Multiut breached the Guaranty by failing to pay after demand, when due, the Unpaid Principal. Balance and the Interest.
WHEREFORE, Dynegy requests entry of a judgment in its favor and against Multiut, for $12,504,912.51, plus interest, through the date of judgement, in an amount in excess of $593,997.74, and such other relief as the Court deems appropriate.
-4-
COUNT III
(Fraudulent Transfer In Law- Multiut)
27. Dynegy repeats and reasserts the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 26, inclusive, as paragraph 27.
28. At all relevant times, Draiman has been a director, officer and/or control ling shareholder of Multiut.
29. At all relevant times, Draiman has been a general partner in Future Associates or otherwise had authority and/or control over the business affairs of Futures Associates or an entity that had authority over the business affairs of Futures Associates.
30. Since at least January 1999, Multiut failed to make timely payment, when due, for some or all of the natural gas delivered by Dynegy.
31. On March 7, 2001, Ginger Wright of Dynegy and Lenore Kamien of Multiut ' agreed that Multiut owed Dynegy approximately $11,000,000, excluding interest.
32. On September 5, 2001, Dynegy representatives Pete Pavluk and Mark Ludwig met with Multiut representatives Lenore Kamien and/or Nachshon Draiman at Multiut's offices to discuss the amount owed by Multiut.
33. At that meeting, Mr. Draiman said that Multiut did not have funds sufficient to pay the debt owed and that Multiut would propose a payment plan by September 17, 2001.
34. In a September 17, 2001 letter, Multiut proposed a payment plan by which it would make monthly payments, from October 2001 through March 2002, in order to pay down the amount owed to Dynegy. The proposed payments ranged from $600,000 in some months to $1,800,000 in other months. According to Mr. Draiman, Multiut was, 'insurefd] [sic] an additional annual profit of $2,000,000' and that, 'in the meantime, [Multiut] was working on bank financing as well as funds from private sources for capital infusion.'
-5-
35 . In an October 4, 2001 letter to Multiut, Dynegy responded to Multiut's September 17, 2001 proposal by asking for 'a detailed formal plan by no later than Wednesday, October 10, 2001 that outlines bringing your account balance current by no later that [sic]-January 15, 2002.'
36. In an October 12, 2001 letter, Multiut responded to Dynegy's October 4, 2001 letter by proposing 'weekly payments for October through January.' The weekly payments proposed by Multiut totaled $7,700,000.
37. Multiut did not make all the weekly payments described in its October 12, 2001
letter.
38. Multiut's check , dated August 23, 2001, made payable to Dynegy for $300,000, was returned for insufficient funds.
39. Multiut's check, dated October 26, 2001, made payable to Dynegy for $150,000, was returned for insufficient funds.
40. Multiut's check, dated November 9, 2001, made payable to Dynegy for $200,000, was returned for insufficient funds.
41. Multiut check no. 1946, made payable to Dynegy for $200,000 and deposited on December 7, 2001, was returned twice due to insufficient funds.
42. On January 8, 2002, Multiut claimed it could not pay the amounts owed to Dynegy because of slow payment by the government in connection with Mr. Draiman's nursing homes.
43. On January 31, 2002, Multiut told Dynegy that it would make a $200,000 payment while it worked to raise cash through a factoring company and while it attempted to arrange a line of credit with Bank Leumi.
-6-
54. Multiut did not receive reasonably equivalent value for the transfer described in paragraph 53.
55. In the years 1999 through 2003, Multiut transferred cash or other assets to Future Associates, Draiman and/or other entities, including Draiman's nursing home, hotel or other business interests when Multiut was indebted to Dynegy.
56. Multiut did not receive reasonably equivalent value for the transfers desciibed in paragraph 55.
57. When Multiut made the transfers described in paragraphs 53 and 55 (the 'Transfers'), Multiut was insolvent and/or became insolvent as a result of the Transfers.
58. The Transfers were fraudulent conveyances in violation of applicable laws.
WHEREFORE, Dynegy requests entry of an order granting judgment in its favor and against Multiut, for $12,504,912.51, plus interest, through the date of judgment, in an amount in excess of $593,997.74; voiding the fraudulent transfers and returning the Transfers to Multiut to be used to satisfy the debt to Dynegy; and such other relief as this Court deems appropriate.
COUNT IV (Fraudulent Transfer In Fact- Multiut)
59. Dynegy repeats and reasserts the allegations of paragraphs 1 through 58, inclusive, as paragraph 59.
60. The Transfers were made with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud Dynegy, a creditor of Multiut and as-such constituted fraudulent conveyances in violation of applicable laws.
WHEREFORE, Dynegy requests entry of an order granting judgment in its favor and against Multiut, for $12,504,912.51, plus interest, through the date of judgment, in an amount in excess of $593,997.74; voiding the fraudulent transfers and returning the money to Multiut to be
-8-
used to satisfy the debt to Dynegy; punitive damages and such other relief as this Court deems
•
appropriate.
Ken Ditkowsky
wrote on May 16, 2007 9:52 AM:
' Read your story with interest. In my opinion we apparently have not learned from the Resko transactions. While Government cannot plan and execute a 'one car funeral' it should not delegate its responsibilites 'helter skelter.' The Illinois Court records are replete with information concerning the people involved in the transaction. '
Jerald Dims
wrote on May 16, 2007 8:52 AM:
' See Illinois Court documents federal and state regarding Nachshon Draiman, Future associates, Multiut corp. being involved in fraudulent actions and inflated billing, defrauding partners of $8 million dollars, fraudulent documents to the illinois department of Registration to obtain a Nursing Home License, defrauding the banks in Israel - currently pending a lawsuit and a criminal investigation 02c7446 '
This is just a small sample of the various actions and criminal and fraudulent acts by Nachshon Draiman and his alter ego companies.
Yehuda Draiman 8/15/2007
פרקי מלון פנינת דן בירושלים: לחייב את היזמים ב-20 מיליון שקל
טוענים כי יזמי הקמת המלון, נחשון ואליצור דריימן, ביצעו פעולות לא חוקיות שהביאו את המלון לחוב של כ-45 מיליון דולר, רובו לדיסקונט
שמואל דקלו
16:18 15/1/07
המפרקים של מלון פנינת דן שבירושלים דורשים בבית המשפט המחוזי בירושלים לחייב את יזמי הקמת המלון בפיצוי של למעלה מ-20 מיליון שקלים. בתביעה שהגישו המפרקים, עוה"ד יאיר גרין ירון פיינשטיין וניצן שמואלי, הם טוענים כי יזמי הקמת המלון, האחים נחשון ואליצור דריימן, ביצעו פעולות לא חוקיות שהביאו את המלון לחוב של כ-45 מיליון דולר, רובו לבנק דיסקונט
(
904
-0.66% )
.
המפרקים טוענים כי הם מצויים בהליכי מכירת הנכס, כאשר התשלום המבוקש הוא כ-20 מיליון דולר, ולאחר המכירה יגיע סכום החובות לכ-25 מיליון דולר.
את
מודעה
ההפרש הם מבקשים מהאחים דריימן, שהקימו את המלון באמצעות חברת חוץ שהתאגדה באלינוי.
המלון, שבו 88 חדרים ו-22 סוויטות, הופעל על ידי רשת מלונות דן, ולטענת המפרקים בעלי המלון לשעבר חייבים לרשת כ-900 אלף שקל.
לדבריהם, האחים דריימן ביצעו העברות פיקטיביות בין חשבונות; נתנו בטוחות באמצעות צ'קים שאת החשבון ממנו נמשך אחד הצ'קים סגרו; הציגו מצגי שווא בדבר סכום ההשקעה במלון; העבירו כספים לחו"ל מכספי החברה ללא הסבר וניפחו את סכום בניית המלון (כ-2,500 דולר למטר) בסכומים העולים פי כמה על הערכות הסבירות של בניית המלון.
עוד נטען, כי הם הציגו מצג מטעה כלפי מרכז ההשקעות על מנת להשיג הלוואות בערבות מדינה ומענקים. (פש"ר 119/99
MULTIUT OWNED BY NACHSHON DRAIMAN IS CHARGED WITH FRAUDULENT ENERGY BILLING……………………………………..
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CHANCERY DIVISION
FILED
JACK GORE on behalf of himself and all ) NOV 28, 2002
other persons or entitles similarly situated, |
•
vs. No. 01 CH 19688
DOROTHY 8ROWN CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
MULTIUT CORP, an Illinois corporation, } Judge Stephen A, Schiller
Defendant ) Courtroom 2402
RESPONSE TO §2-619.1 MOTION TO DISMISS J/
Plaintiff JACK GORE (“Gore”). by his attorneys LARRY D DRURY LTD., hereby responds to the Motion to Dismiss 2nd Amended Complaint, pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-615 and 619, brought as a combined 2-619.1 motion by defendant MULTIUT CORP. (“Multiut”).
Introduction
Multiut is trying to time-bar this case by transforming express a written agency-service contract drafted by Multiut into a contract for sale of goods, and by disputing Gore's allegations as to concealment and discovery of the wrong – but without submitting any Rule 191 affidavit or documentation. This is a class action arising out
of a written contract drafted by Multiut, attached here and to the 2nd Amended Complaint as Exhibit A and B collectively referred to herein as the "contract" or "agreement “ unless otherwise indicated by context): (1)
(A) A service contract to act as Gore's "purchasing representatives" in obtaining natural gas from “off system" suppliers. This contract, entered into on or about December 1990, was titled “Agreement," Exh. A 1, 3-6, 10. And,
{B} A series of supplemental agency contracts to act as Gore’s agent, in so doing with respect to various Properties. These were entered into contemporaneously with the service contract and thereafter, and titled "Natural Gas Purchasing and Agency Agreement.” Exh.-B. (2)
(1) Similarly Multiut refers to them collectively as “the agreement” in its brief (Mem. p. 2, fn. 1). Although the documents are on separately filed pages, they are mutually inclusive and one could not be entered into without the other; e.g. the service contract refers to and incorporates the agency contracts, wherein Multiut refers to itself as Gore's 'exclusive natural gas purchasing agent'. See Exh. A, third introductory paragraph and 16-17; Exh. B 1,
(2) Exh. 8 one of the series, is dated 1998, Exh. C is Gore’s §2-806 affidavit as to the others. Gore has stated he does not have a copy of each, they are inaccessible to him i.e. no longer in his possession, whether missplaced or otherwise, and cannot be located or returned. 2nd Amd.. Compl. {4; Exh, C, in the 1st Amd. Complaint, Count 4 for breach of oral contract was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice after Gore's deposition of May 8,- 2002, when the service contract and the 1998 agency contract were produced by Multiut and adequately established, Exhs, A-B are the same Exhs. 1-2 attached to the Gore transcript, excerpts of which are attached herein as Exh. D, Similarly the missing agency agreements are likely in Multiut’s possession and will be produced in discovery.
The contract was drafted by Multiut, it unequivocally defines Multiut's role in the transactions, and shows that this case is not governed by the UCC. What is at issue here is not the "good" that Multiut obtained for Gore, but the service Multiut provided as his purchasing agent. Gore is suing upon the service and agency contract – not the natural gas - and has alleged that Multiut breached its duties in two respects;
{1} By falsely and intentionally charging and retaining for its own use funds that were to be applied to a City of Chicago 8% gross receipts tax (“Tax”), which it had promised would be placed in escrow and forwarded to the City. Between December 1990 and January 1995 (after the City of Chicago changed the Tax), Multiut collected approximately $14,000 from Gore and at least $1 million to $1.5 million from the Class, for this Tax that was not actually imposed upon Multiut. 2nd Amd. Compl. 7-9, '3! Multiut not only failed to inform Plaintiff and
the Class that the money collected was not so applied or escrowed, but also failed to escrow, account for, and refund the funds with interest.
(2) By overcharging for the service of providing natural gas. Multiut was to charge for natural gas actually supplied to Gore and the Class on a set per therm cost basis, plus an amount equal to 1/2 of their respective per therm cost savings per month, instead, Multiut overcharged and billed Gore at least $100.000 and the class millions of dollars and refuses to provide an accounting and refund with interest. Id. 10-11.
Gore has further alleged that Multiut prevented him from discovering the wrongs by intentionally concealing them until at least December 2000, when he discovered the truth and could not reasonably have done so earlier. (Gore testified at his deposition on May 8, 2002 that he first discovered the discrepancies in his bills, the overcharges, the taxes, and failure to escrow the taxes, in December 2000. See Exh, D, pp. 25-28,) Thereafter he was unable to obtain any refund and based thereon, terminated Multiut’s services on or about June 2001, However, the wrongful acts are continuing to date, in that Multiut continues to 'refuse to provide an accounting and refund with interest to Gore and the Class, all to their detriment and damage. They seek imposition of constructive trust (id. 22), an accounting and damages in not less than the foregoing amounts plus interest (id, 9-13, 23).
Gore filed the original Class Action Complaint on Nov. 20, 2001, and in lieu of responding to a motion to dismiss, filed the 1st Amended Class Action Complaint Feb. 14, 2002, setting forth 4 counts for (1) breach of
3-: The City did not and will not collect the 8% Tax, presumably because of U.S. constitutional restrictions as to the interstate commerce clause and exceptions for interstate pipelines and out-of-state suppliers. As a result in 1994 the City changed the tax from an 8% gross receipts tax to a flat rate tax of 1.4 to 1.5 cents per therm. 2nd Amd. Comp. P 8. in Multiut’s response to First Request to Admit {attached hereto as Exh. F), it has admitted the following statements about this Tax; (8) that Multiut collected approximately $14,000 in Tax from Gore between 1991-1994; and (9) that Multiut spent its customers Tax payments on business expenses.. Yehuda Draiman testified to the same effect in his deposition 1-10-02 See transcript excerpts attached hereto as Exh. E, at pp, 36-37,40, 68, and Exh, 6 thereto.
Activity Date: 8/15/2007 Participant: GORE JACK
CASE SET ON STATUS CALL
Court Date: 8/29/2007
Court Time: 0930
Court Room: 2402
Judge: BRONSTEIN, PHILIP L.
Nachshon Draiman Conviction for the death of a patient and abuse in his Mill View nursing homes in Niles, Illinois.
Nachshon Draiman - Multiut Corp. – Future Associates Fraud
You will note that State and Federal Court records in Illinois and elsewhere are replete with lawsuits, judgments and wrongdoing by Nachshon Draiman and his companies. Causing the death of patients in the Nursing homes and a lawsuit by the State of Illinois with civil and criminal conviction People v. Gurell, Nachshon Draiman (1983), 98 Ill.2d 194, 207, 74 Ill.Dec. 516, 456 N.E.2d 18.). Abusing nursing home patients see State of Illinois records.
See People of the State of Illinois vs. Gurell, Nachshon Draiman et al – 456 N.E.2d 18 there has been numerous patient abuse and deaths due to that abuse. In 127 Ill.App.3d 1165, 483 N.E.2d 731, 91 Ill.Dec. 385 Sonnenberg v. Mill View Associates, Nachshon Draiman where millions of dollars had to be paid as damages for abuse and death of a patient, not to mention numerous patients who died falling down an elevator shaft.
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian W. Ellis Claims he has DNA forensic evidence that Nachshon Draiman - Multiut forged and modified documents presented to the Court in his lawsuit against his brother Yehuda J. Draiman
The Supposed 1991 IMA Agreement Put Into Evidence by Multiut – Nachshon Draiman Is a Fraud
The evidence overwhelmingly favors Yehuda Draimans' account of events. There are at least eight separate, independent indicators that Nachshon Draiman deceptively modified an IMA Agreement that Yehuda received and signed in 1989, added terms to which Yehuda never agreed, including the incorporation of an unsigned Employee Confidentiality Agreement, and inserted a false date of execution to create the document introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 10. First, Defendants' expert forensic ink analyst, Erich Speckin, testified that he found manufacturer date tags in the ink for the disputed writings on Plaintiff's Exhibit 10, and that the sequence of those date tags establishes without question that the ink was manufactured in 1993, two years after Nachshon Draiman said he made the writings. (8/14/02 Tr., at 2214-25) That testimony is undisputed.
It is a known fact that justice in Chicago can be swayed in your favor with proper incentives.
Nachshon Draiman’s intimidation of witnesses, blackmail and other scare tactics will not work.
Nachshon Draiman defrauds Israel Discount Bank in Hotel financing to the tune of $45 million dollars.
Utilizing modified and fabricated sales contract of units in the Jerusalem Pearl purchased and totally paid for by 1. Nachshon Draiman, 2. Elitzur Draiman, 3. Irwin Katz a former Federal Judge and part owner of Multiut, 4. Barry Ray, 5. Danny Shabat, 6. Gershon Bassman, 7. Dr. Sam Lipschitz, 8. It seems presenting false and deceptive documents is a way of life for Nachshon Draiman
Nachshon Draiman presented a forged College Diploma to the Illinois Department of Registration in order to receive his Nursing Home Administrator’s license No. 44001323.
See: www.antidefamationusa.com
Jay Drai..AKA Yehuda Jay Draiman...THE REAL FRAUD...and ADJUDICATED FACTS..His claims are malicious, false, meritless,misrepresentations of the REAL FACTS and contrived. These baseless accusations are the fabrications of a disgruntled former employee, Yehuda "Jay" Draiman, a CONVICTED FELON who has been FOUND GUILTY of charges leading to millions of dollars in judgments by the Illinois and federal court system.
Left with no legal or rational alternative, "Jay" has resorted to conjuring up false stories and contrived meritless accusations on the internet and public forums, to attempt to smear his former employee.
These facts can be verified by court records available from a Google search for "Multiut v. Yehuda".
Yehuda Jay Draiman is a former employee who was terminated in 2001 from Multiut Corporation when he was discovered diverting clients and funds of the company. He was subsequently FOUND GUILTY of breaches of fiduciary duty, consumer FRAUD and deceptive trade practices and CONSPIRACY, and a judgment in excess of $1.5 million was entered against him, in addition to several findings of contempt, by the Cook County Circuit Court & upheld by the Appellate court (ruling 1-03-0857).
http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2005/1stDistrict/July/Html/1030857.htm
Federal courts have also entered subsequent judgments against Yehuda and his wife Miriam for committing false bankruptcy filings in yet another attempt to defame his former employer. Federal courts declared the judgments to be non-dischargeable due to the fraud involved by Yehuda Draiman, for abusing the court system in a manner similar to the way he now attempts to abuse the internet. These FACTS can be verified by federal court records available from a Google search for "Doyle Draiman".
http://www.ilnb.uscourts.gov/JudgeDoyle/Opinions/Draiman_Yehuda.pdf
Public documents verify that 'Jay' was also CONVICTED OF 10 COUNTS of wire and mail FRAUD during the 1980's. Nachshon, Yehuda’s brother, originally provided Yehuda with a job in the Multiut company subsequent to general assistance he provided to help Yehuda and his family following Yehuda‘s first stint of a FOUR YEARS sentence to the FEDRAL PENITENTIARY for that conviction in the 80's. See United States v. Draiman, 784 F.2d 248 (7th Cir. 1986)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/7th/023922p.pdf
Yehuda Draiman was also the subject of a special investigation conducted by the Illinois Legislative Investigating Commission for the Illinois General Assembly (see:4/22/75 Illinois Nursing Homes: A Report to the Illinois General Assembly). “Jay” was barred from serving in the nursing home field after HE DEFRAUDED A RESIDENT under his care of more than $40,000. The report cites testimony from a resident stating that Yehuda offered to return her money if she took a ride with him to his “bank”, and instead LEFT HER STRANDED in a deserted cornfield in the DEAD OF WINTER in 8 degree weather. Only by luck was she spotted by a passerby who reported the incident to the MCHENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S Department. When the sheriff’s office interviewed Yehuda, he claimed “when they got out into the country she asked to be let out. He let her out and drove back to Chicago…and found her purse in the back seat.” In these instances, as well as the recent litigation, Yehuda Jay Draiman's tactic has been to invent illegalities to accuse his victims of, in order to shift the focus of attention away from him.
http://multiut.com/responses_to_YJD /IL_Assembly_Report_04_75.pdf
The current posting is just another example of Yehuda Jay Draiman's tactics.
For more information about defamation attempts by Yehuda Jay Draiman, see www.Illinoisantidefamation.com or www.IllinoisDefamationProtection.com
INCREASING COST OF ENERGY and INFLATED FRAUDULENT BILLING
It is not enough that consumers are paying higher cost for energy – Gas, Electric, Tel., Etc.
Due to the market volatility and the increase demand for energy worldwide and the manipulation of market conditions by various corporation.
Deregulation, which was designed to save the consumer on the cost of energy. Many new companies have started selling gas and electric in the past 20 years, as a result of this deregulation. We now have numerous deregulated third party suppliers of Gas and Electric that are gouging the consumers – billing prices higher than the regulated utility companies, inflating the bill, billing for product never delivered, billing phantom tax on the product, reneging on fixed price contract – when market prices go beyond the fixed contract. In short any way they can cheat, deceive and defraud the consumer is fair game.
Among the companies that practice such tactics is MULTIUT CORP or Multiut LLC of Skokie, Illinois the owner of the company Nachshon Draiman is well connected, one of the previous owners of Multiut was a federal judge and therefore has gotten away with numerous over billing and deceptive practices, there are numerous lawsuits for fraud pending against Multiut Corp and its owner Nachshon Draiman among them a Class Action Suit and Dynegy Mkg & Trade v. Multiut Corp, Nachshon Draiman et al 1:02-cv-07446 The Federal Court has imposed numerous contempt orders against Multiut and its owner and its owner Nachshon Draiman is involved in numerous other fraud in the Nursing Home business (defrauding the state Nursing License with false documents to obtain a Nursing Home License) and a hotel project where he committed a fraud of $45 million dollars and numerous other fraud and deception too numerous to mention. (Especially since Multiut and its owner Nachshon Draiman is represented by Jack Abramoff Law Firm – which has clout).
Energy Billing Fraud Charges vs Multiut owned by Nachshon Draiman!
Multiut Admitted to holding money belonging to customers.
In a Class Action proceeding initiated in November 2001 - The case after numerous delays by Multiut, is now proceeding.
Gore vs Multiut - IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS Case No. 01 CH 19688 (See: www.antidefamationusa.com)
Another Company is Santana Energy out of Texas. Some utility companies were forced to refund the consumers hundreds of million of dollars due to manipulation of pricing and billing – many of those shenanigans stem from the Enron debacle some precede it and continue on to date.
Many of these suppliers of Gas and Electric who are promoting saving are actually charging higher prices than the local utility company which defeats the intent of deregulation – Multiut’s billing shows 20% to 30% higher cost and billing for gas that was never delivered. Not to mention Multiut’s billing for non existent City of Chicago Tax on Natural gas and inflated billing for lighting retrofit to various Nursing Homes which inflates the Medicaid billing to the government.
Corporate CEO and other higher ups in the corporate world have been convicted of fraud and sentenced/fined (WorldCom, Enron, Adelphia, Etc.). But it seems that some companies can continue to defraud the public without being hindered by the authorities.
Other frauds by Gas Electric suppliers are: Centerpoint Energy Inc.,
Pending lawsuits are: AG files fraud suit against Sempra affiliate alleging Enron-like games.
The American people want corporate fraud and criminal activities by corporate executives to be stopped now, and they expect government to act aggressively to accomplish that goal. Clearly, the federal and state governments have a shared responsibility to make this happen. It’s also essential for the criminal and civil courts to be kept open and available to deal with this most serious problem, which that has become like a cancer in our country. I suppose that all of this sort of thing has been going on for years, but the public just didn’t know about it. I have always suspected that the “tort reform” movement was devised by smart folks in the very beginning to protect corporate wrongdoers. I am now firmly convinced – more than ever – that I was on target at the time in my suspicions.
JD
This article is presented by Citizen for Honest and Fair Billing
PS
THREE FORMER NICOR ENERGY EXECUTIVES AND OUTSIDE
LAWYER INDICTED IN ALLEGED CORPORATE FRAUD SCHEME
CHICAGO -- Three former executives of Nicor Energy L.L.C. and an outside lawyer for the Lisle, Ill.-based company were indicted today for allegedly engaging in a corporate fraud scheme to obtain $400,000 in bonuses and other benefits for themselves by inflating revenues - at times by as much as $6 million - and understating expenses to make the company appear more profitable than it actually was in 2001. The defendants allegedly fraudulently deprived Nicor Energy - a retail energy marketing company established in 1997 as a 50/50 joint venture by Nicor Inc. and Dynegy Inc. - of their honest services and caused a loss to investors in publicly-traded Nicor, Inc. and Dynegy. On July 18, 2002, Nicor Inc. issued a press release announcing that its financial results for the second quarter and first half of 2002 were negatively affected by several factors, including irregularities in accounting at Nicor Energy, and the following day, the stock price of Nicor Inc. fell approximately 40 percent. Nicor Energy is currently in the process of final liquidation.
The five-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury charges Kevin Stoffer, formerly Nicor Energy's President and Chief Executive Officer; Andrew Johnson, former Director of Financial Services; John Fringer, former Vice President of Major Markets and Power Services; and outside counsel Michael Munson, announced Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois
Judge Concludes Energy Company Drove Up Prices
by Richard A. Oppel Jr. and Lowell Bergman, September 24, 2002 (New York Times)
QUOTE: In the ruling, Curtis L. Wagner Jr., the chief administrative law judge at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, essentially validates the suspicions of California officials that El Paso, the nation's largest natural gas company, withheld natural gas from the state, thus driving up the cost of electricity...
ABSTRACT: In a judge’s ruling, a company who provides gas and energy supplies was found to have aided in raising the price of gas and electricity in California during previous energy crisis’s. The El Paso Corporation allegedly withheld natural gas, and in doing so, raised both gas and electricity prices. The ruling is still up for further review and many lawsuits are pending, but the El Paso Corporation contends that operations were normal and that an appeal will follow if the current decision is upheld.
--- C. Heimbuch-Skaley
MADIGAN, DALEY ANNOUNCE $196 MILLION SETTLEMENT WITH PEOPLES ENERGY; CUSTOMERS OF PEOPLES GAS AND NORTH SHORE GAS TO RECEIVE $100 MILLION IN CREDITS
Chicago – Attorney General Lisa Madigan and Mayor Richard M. Daley today announced that Peoples Energy has agreed to more than $196 million in consumer credits and benefits as part of a settlement that will provide much-needed relief to current Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas customers, establish a more than $25 million program of conservation and weatherization assistance for low- and moderate-income households and reconnect customers who have been disconnected from their heating services due to an inability to pay the high gas prices.
MADIGAN, DALEY, CUB ANNOUNCE REFUND CREDITS TO APPEAR ON NEXT GAS BILL FOR CUSTOMERS OF PEOPLES GAS AND NORTH SHORE GAS
Chicago — Attorney General Lisa Madigan, City of Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley and Citizens Utility Board (CUB) Executive Director David Kolata today announced that as a result of their settlement agreement with Peoples Energy more than one million current customers of Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas will see refund credits on their next gas bills.
To compensate for over billing consumers between 2000 and 2004, Peoples Energy has agreed to provide a refund credit to each of the 1,014,071 current customers of Peoples Gas and North Shore Gas. The credits – totaling $100 million – will be included on the first bill received by customers after April 24.
“These refund credits cannot change the conduct of Peoples Energy, but they will help consumers who suffered as a result,” Madigan said. “This is an appropriate response to Peoples' conduct.”
“We are pleased that consumers are finally receiving the refunds that they deserve,” said City of Chicago Corporation Counsel Mara Georges. “Consumers should not have to pay for bad planning and business decisions by Peoples Gas.”
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 2007
Justice Department Investigating NY Energy Markets
New York's wholesale energy market is being investigated for possible antitrust violations, according to a recent news report. A Newsday story indicates that a subject of the investigation may be possible withholding of capacity from the market, to drive prices up. This revelation has raised further questions regarding the proposed merger of National Grid and Keyspan, which controls significant amounts of generation capacity in the New York City markets.
Reliance Energy fraud on consumers
REL power bills have shocked Mumbai citizens, who will now have to pay double the amount they had been paying. A citizen pins down — point-by-point — the discrepancies in this billing and warns of the "REL fraud" perpetrated on the consumer.
2007.09.17
Oilman on trial in New York was involved in Austin's 1970s energy crisis
Monday, September 10, 2007
Former president of Coastal States Gas charged with wire fraud and conspiracy
Lawyers for Austin and San Antonio also learned that Lo-Vaca was selling gas to utilities serving the Dallas-Fort Worth area at the same time it was curtailing in Austin and San Antonio. In 1974 and 1975, Austin and other customers sued Lo-Vaca for $1.6 billion in rate overcharges.
EnCana Corp. et al.
A class action lawsuit has been filed against EnCana Corp., its marketing company, and sixteen other companies and corporations on behalf of Fairhaven Power Co. and all other business entities in the state of California that purchased natural gas between Jan. 1, 2000, and Dec. 31, 2001. The suit alleges a massive scheme to control the flow and prices of natural gas that was sold within California, which is a violation of U.S. antitrust laws. The suit further charges the companies with false reporting of natural gas prices, of conducting "wash trades" designed to boost trading volumes and conspiring to avoid competing with each other in the pricing and sale of natural gas in California.
Centerpoint Energy Inc. et. al.
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Centerpoint Energy Inc. and other natural gas suppliers on behalf of millions of residential customers in Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Mississippi and Minnesota. The suit alleges fraud, unjust enrichment and claims that a conspiracy between the companies has led to the artificially inflated natural gas prices.
If you feel you qualify for damages or remedies that might be awarded in this class action please click the link below to submit your complaint.
BP & Reliant - Guilty of Price Fixing
In yet another settlement over the California Energy Crisis, BP & Reliant admit guilt and settle with the State of California.
Source: TheTip, 2003-07-21
Candidate: Enron
Naturally, the settlement does nothing to compensate the hundreds of thousands of people whose jobs and lives were ruined by the FERC-Caused California Recession.
BP Energy agreed to contribute $3 million to fund low-income home energy assistance programs in California and Arizona to settle a case in which federal energy regulators said that they found apparent evidence of power price manipulation.
In March, staff members of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued a report on the 2000-01 energy crisis in the West. It said it found evidence indicating Reliant Resources and BP Energy, both based in Houston, appeared to have engaged in coordinated efforts to manipulate power prices at a trading hub in Arizona.
Both companies were ordered to demonstrate why their authority to sell power on unregulated wholesale markets shouldn't be revoked.
BP Energy doesn't lose that ability under the settlement. But for six months, BP Energy's electricity sales in the West will be subject to review by the FERC with the possibility of refunds.
Mid America Energy Inc.,
The Securities and Exchange Commission said today that it had filed a civil complaint against Gary M. Milby and his company, Mid-America Energy Inc., asserting that they bilked several hundred investors of more than $19 million in what the commission described as "a fraudulent oil-and-gas investment scheme."
SEC charges four more former Nortel execs
Allegations the men manipulated reserves to change Nortel earnings
The Associated Press
Updated: 6:36 a.m. PT Sept 13, 2007
TORONTO - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has charged four more former Nortel Networks Corp. executives with accounting fraud, alleging they manipulated reserves to change Nortel’s earnings statements on the orders of more senior officers of the Canadian networking equipment maker.
Sept. 21, 2007
ENERGY Edison Is Hit Hard For Fraud On Survey
Category: Lexis Nexis - AC, CG News & Updates, Acc News & Updates, A/F News & Updates, ET News & Updates, PG News & Updates, Main AC RSS Feed, AC - Whats New
BY: LOS ANGELES TIMES – Oct. 2, 2007
ELIZABETH DOUGLASS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
There is "overwhelming" evidence that senior managers at Southern California Edison knew about a seven-year fraud at the Rosemead utility to collect millions of dollars in customer-funded incentives, according to a judge's decision released Monday by the California Public Utilities Commission.
The opinion, written by Administrative Law Judge Robert Barnett, makes official the $200-million cost to Edison that he outlined Thursday in an unusual oral preview of his conclusions. The decision required Edison to lose $160 million in performance bonuses and to pay a $40-million fine -- among the largest ever assessed by the commission.
Waste Management Pays For Executives' Fraud
Washington (Aug. 30, 2005) - Looking to avoid the publicity of a trial, the country's largest trash hauler will pay $26.8 million to cover most of the costs of a settlement between former executives and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The settlement by Waste Management Inc. was approved in U.S. District Court in Chicago. Originally filed in 2002, the SEC suit had accused Waste Management's founder and former chair, Dean Buntrock, and three other former executives of failing to report expenses, postponing costs and filing false financial statements, in order to meet earnings targets between 1992 and 1997.
A new chief executive of the company ordered a review of the company's accounting practices in late 1997, eventually uncovering the problems and leading to a restatement of $1.7 billion in earnings. At the time, the restatement was the largest in the country's history.
In 2001, Waste Management agreed to pay $457 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging securities-law violations, and received about $20 million in a related settlement with now-defunct auditor Arthur Andersen LLP. At the time of that settlement, Buntrock reportedly agreed to pay a $2.3 million fine, and Andersen later paid another $7 million to settle with the SEC.
Conviction upheld in Cendant case
A federal appeals court upheld the conviction of former Cendant Corp. Chairman Walter Forbes on Monday for leading an accounting fraud.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York upheld Forbes' conviction on conspiracy to commit securities fraud and two counts of making false statements. Forbes was sentenced to 12 years and seven months in prison and ordered to pay more than $3 billion in restitution. Forbes, 64, reported to prison Aug. 7. 2007.
THE BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SCORECARD: ARRESTS, INDICTMENTS, AND CONVICTIONS
ARRESTED: Adelphia CEO. U.S. Justice Department officials marched the head of Adelphia Communications and two of his sons out of their luxury apartment in handcuffs. The trio was charged with turning the bankrupt cable company into "the family's personal piggy bank," hiding $2.3 billion in debt and using up to $1 billion for personal expenses. (Robert Gearty and Helen Kennedy, "Cable Mogul Busted," [New York] Daily News, July 25, 2002)
ARRESTED: WorldCom Executives. "Applause broke out on lower Manhattan's Federal plaza when former WorldCom executives Scott Sullivan and David F. Meyers were ushered, arms handcuffed behind them, through the morning crowd." (James Toedtman and Tom Brune, "WorldCom Exec's Walk Of Shame," Newsday, August 2, 2002)
ARRESTED: ImClone CEO. The Justice Department arrested Samuel Waksal on charges of tipping off relatives to sell company stock a day before the Food and Drug Administration rejected ImClone's application for a new cancer drug. The Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that the family "dumped more than $10 million in stock in a 48-hour period." (Devlin Barrett, "Former CEO Of ImClone Systems Arrested On Insider-Trading Charges," The Associated Press, June 13, 2002)
ARRESTED AND INDICTED: Former Tyco Executive. Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski resigned, and was arrested and indicted for sales tax evasion. ("Tyco Falls As S&P, Moody's Confirm Co. Credit Still Under Review," AFX-Asia, September 18, 2002; Devlin Barrett, "Former CEO Of ImClone Systems Arrested On Insider-Trading Charges," The Associated Press, June 13, 2002)
SOON TO BE INDICTED: Former Enron CFO. "Federal prosecutors are expected to announce an indictment of former Enron chief financial officer Andrew Fastow as soon as next week . . . . [T]he government has recently secured a sealed grand jury indictment with fraud charges and other allegations against Fastow and subordinates who enriched themselves through Enron's partnership deals." (Greg Farrell and Edward Iwata, "Indictment Of Former Enron CFO Fastow Expected Soon," USA Today, September 25, 2002)
INDICTED: Two WorldCom Executives. The Justice Department charged Scott D. Sullivan, the former chief financial officer, and Buford Yates Jr., the former director of accounting, with "falsely and fraudulently" reducing expenses to inflate earnings by $5 billion. They also made false statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Earlier this year, WorldCom acknowledged that it had falsely booked $7.7 billion in expenses. (Carrie Johnson and Jonathan Krim, "Ex-Finance Chief, Colleague Indicted," The Washington Post, August 29, 2002)
INDICTED: Five Adelphia Executives. Adelphia Communications Corp. Founder John J. Rigas, two of his sons, and two former executives were indicted on charges of conspiracy, securities fraud and wire fraud. The Justice Department is seeking to have the men forfeit $2.5 billion they received from the "large-scale accounting fraud and corporate looting." (Devlin Barrett, "Adelphia Founder, Four Others Indicted On Securities Fraud," The Washington Post, September 23, 2002)
CONVICTED: Arthur Andersen. Marking the first time a major accounting firm has ever been convicted of a felony, a jury found Arthur Andersen LLP guilty of destroying documents related to the collapse of Enron. The company faces up to $500,000 in fines. (Carrie Johnson and Peter Behr, "Andersen Guilty Of Obstruction," The Washington Post, June 16, 2002)
PLED GUILTY: Former Enron Executive. Former Enron managing director Michael Kopper pled guilty to participating in a conspiracy against the company and its shareholders. Kopper agreed to forfeit $12 million. (Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson, Press Conference, August 21, 2002)
Prosecutors and agency attorneys who are part of the Task Force have brought charges for accounting fraud, securities fraud, insider trading, market manipulation, wire fraud, obstruction of justice, false statements, money laundering, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations, stock option backdating and conspiracy, among others.
The following cases highlight just a sample of the exhaustive prosecutorial efforts of the U.S. Attorneys' Offices and the Criminal and Tax Divisions of the Department of Justice and investigators of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation:
The following cases highlight just a sample of the exhaustive prosecutorial efforts of the U.S. Attorneys' Offices and the Criminal and Tax Divisions of the Department of Justice and investigators of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation:
-- Enron: Criminal charges were brought against 36 defendants, including 27 former Enron Corporation executives. Eighteen of those charged pleaded guilty or were found guilty after trial, including Enron's former chief executive officer, who was sentenced to 292 months in prison. The guilty verdicts against the former chairman/CEO in two cases were dismissed by abatement following his death. The Task Force seized over $100 million in ill-gotten gains and the Department of Justice worked jointly with the Securities and Exchange Commission to obtain orders directing the recovery of more than $450 million for the victims of the Enron frauds.
-- Enterasys: Eight former officers of Enterasys Network Systems, Inc., including the chairman and the chief financial officer, have pleaded guilty or have been found guilty at trial of charges stemming from a scheme to artificially inflate revenue to increase, or maintain, the price of Enterasys stock. The fraud caused Enterasys to overstate its revenue by over $11 million in the quarter ending Sept. 1, 2001. The fraud and its public disclosure resulted in a loss to shareholders of about $1.3 billion. As a result, Enterasys Chief Financial Officer Robert J. Gagalis was sentenced to 11 and a half years in prison. Bruce D. Kay, formerly Enterasys's Senior Vice President of Finance, was sentenced to nine and a half years in prison. Robert G. Barber, a former Enterasys business development executive, was sentenced to eight years in prison and fined $25,000. Hor Chong (David) Boey, former finance executive in Enterasys's Asia Pacific division, was sentenced to three years in prison.
-- Qwest: The former CEO of Qwest Communications International, Inc., was convicted on insider-trading charges stemming from his sale of more than $100 million in Qwest stock while in possession of material, non-public information regarding Qwest's financial health. A former CFO pleaded guilty to insider trading. The CEO will be sentenced on July 27, 2007.
-- AEP: AEP Energy Services, Inc. (AEPES), a wholly owned subsidiary of American Electric Power, Inc. (AEP), one of the nation's largest electric utilities, entered into a deferred prosecution agreement in which it admitted that its traders manipulated the natural gas market by knowingly submitting false trading reports to market indices. AEPES agreed to pay a $30 million criminal penalty. In separate actions, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed a civil injunction against AEP and AEPES. The companies also agreed to pay $21 million to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
-- PNC: PNC ICLC Corporation, a subsidiary of the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., the seventh largest bank holding company in the nation, was charged with conspiracy to violate securities laws by fraudulently transferring $762 million in mostly troubled loans and venture capital investments from PNC ICLC to off-balance-sheet entities. PNC entered into a deferred prosecution agreement and PNC ICLC agreed to pay a total of $115 million in restitution and penalties.
-- Cendant: The former chairman and vice-chairman of Cendant Corp. were sentenced to 12 and a half years and 10 years respectively on conspiracy and securities fraud convictions arising out of a complex decade-long accounting fraud scheme. The fraud and its public disclosure caused a market capitalization loss of $14 billion in one day, the largest market capitalization loss ever at that time. Both defendants were ordered to pay $3.2 billion in restitution, which is believed to be the largest restitution order ever imposed.
-- Mercury Finance: Senior executives of Mercury Finance Company, a subprime lending company, were convicted on charges stemming from an accounting fraud scheme designed to inflate the company's revenues and to understate its delinquencies and charge-offs. The market capitalization of the company decreased by nearly $2 billion in one day after the fraud was made public. The former CEO, treasurer and accounting manager each pleaded guilty and were sentenced to 10 years, 20 months, and 12 months, respectively. The former CFO admitted his role and cooperated, but died before being charged.
-- Hollinger: Four former executives of Hollinger International, Inc., a newspaper holding company, including its CEO, chief operating officer, CFO, executive vice president and corporate counsel were recently found guilty of charges arising from a scheme to defraud the company and others primarily by misappropriating funds from non-compete agreements as part of the sale of newspaper publishing groups. The COO pleaded guilty and cooperated.
-- Homestore: Eleven executives and employees of Homestore.com, Inc., an Internet company, were convicted for their roles in a complex revenue inflation scheme. Homestore fraudulently paid itself millions of dollars in bogus "round trip deals" to meet quarterly revenue expectations. The defendants were convicted of conspiracy, insider trading, wire fraud, and other securities violations. The former CEO was found guilty, sentenced to 15 years in prison, and ordered to pay $13 million in fines and restitution.
-- Adelphia: Following a four-month trial, the former CEO and CFO of Adelphia Communications Corp. were convicted of fraud charges arising from their participation in a complex financial-statement fraud and embezzlement scheme that defrauded Adelphia's shareholders and creditors of billions of dollars. The former CEO and CFO were sentenced to 15 and 20 years in prison, respectively. Forfeitures netted over $715 million for distribution to victims.
-- WorldCom: The former WorldCom CEO was convicted on charges of conspiracy, securities fraud, and making false statements in SEC filings, and was sentenced to 25 years' incarceration.
-- Refco: The former CEO of Refco, a commodities brokerage firm, its former CFO, and a former 50 percent Refco owner were indicted for their roles in a scheme to hide massive losses sustained by the company in the late 1990s. Public investor losses exceed $2 billion. The trial is scheduled for October 2007.
-- Impath: The former president and COO of Impath, Inc., a biotechnology company, was convicted for his role in an accounting fraud that caused a decline in the company's market capitalization in excess of $260 million. He was sentenced to 42 months in prison and repayment of $50 million in restitution and $1.2 million in forfeiture.
-- Monster: The former general counsel of recruitment services giant MonsterWorldwide, Inc. pleaded guilty in connection with a scheme to fraudulently backdate millions of dollars' worth of employee stock option grants by creating the appearance that the options had been granted on dates when Monster's stock price had been at a periodic low point.
-- Imclone: The former CEO of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia was convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice and false statement charges and sentenced to five months in prison and five months of home confinement. The charges arose from the former CEO's efforts to obstruct federal investigations into her trading in the securities of ImClone Systems, Inc. The former Inclone CEO pleaded guilty to insider trading and was sentenced to seven years in prison.
-- Bayou: Three principals of Bayou Hedge Funds pleaded guilty to fraud and conspiracy charges based on their substantial and prolonged misrepresentation of the value of the assets of the funds, to which investors had entrusted over $450 million. Forfeitures netted $106 million for distribution to victims.
-- Prudential Securities: Three suspects at the Boston office of Prudential pleaded guilty, and under a deferred prosecution agreement, Prudential agreed to pay a total of $600 million in penalties and restitution in connection with a "market timing" scheme. Using in-and-out deposits and withdrawals of mutual funds, Prudential increased investors' gains by following the rise and fall of foreign markets, which are several hours ahead of U.S. markets.
-- Network Associates: The former CFO of Network Associates, Inc. was convicted by a jury on securities fraud and related charges stemming from a revenue recognition scheme in which Network Associates' revenue was overstated by more than $470 million.
-- DVI: The CFO of DVI, a medical office finance company, was sentenced to 30 months in prison for defrauding DVI's finance companies and banks of $50 million through the use of false corporate books and the double pledging of assets.
-- Beacon Rock: In the first U.S. prosecution of a market timing scheme, hedge fund Beacon Rock Capital and its broker pleaded guilty to defrauding mutual funds and their shareholders of $2.4 million. The defendants used multiple account names and numbers, structured trades to avoid detection, and lied to mutual funds about the activity in order to market time trades.
-- Comverse: The former CFO of Comverse Technology, Inc., pleaded guilty to fraud charges arising from the backdating of option grants and granting of option grants to fictitious employees at Comverse from 1998 to 2006. The former general counsel also was convicted of participating in the backdating scheme. The former CEO was arrested in Namibia in September 2006. The U.S. seeks his extradition.
-- Dynegy: Three former executives of energy firm Dynegy were convicted of charges stemming from an accounting scheme in which they misrepresented the proceeds of $300 million in loans as revenue from operations rather than debt.
-- El Paso: Four traders of energy firm El Paso Corporation and six traders of its Merchant Energy subsidiary were convicted on charges relating to false reporting of natural gas trading information.
Cooperating and Sharing Information across Agencies
For decades, the United States has been widely viewed as having the best approach to corporate governance in the world. But the scandals of the past year – Enron, Worldcom, Global Crossing, Tyco, Imclone and others – have shaken public confidence in the integrity of U.S. financial markets. These events have to led to renewed attention to the system of governance and a consideration of whether particular improvements are needed in order to restore public confidence in U.S. markets. The public forum aims to address what has caused the current crisis and what steps may be needed in the future to prevent these problems from re-emerging or newer ones from erupting, while not harming the strength of U.S. markets.
Attorney General Swanson Files Complaint Regarding
Fixed Natural Gas Billing Programs
Attorney General Lori Swanson today announced that she filed a complaint with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (the “PUC”) regarding the fixed natural gas billing programs offered by Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy. Swanson’s complaint requests that the PUC reevaluate its approval of the programs based on new information her investigation uncovered.
Xcel’s Fixed Monthly Gas Payment program, and CenterPoint’s No Surprise Bill program both purport to offer customers price stability by permitting them to pay a fixed amount every month throughout the year, regardless of swings in natural gas prices. These programs are particularly attractive to senior citizens and others on fixed incomes, who may be concerned that they will be unable to pay their bills if natural gas prices rise substantially.
The Attorney General’s investigation, however, has determined that Xcel and CenterPoint customers who participate in these programs almost always pay more, sometimes hundreds and even thousands of dollars more, than they would have otherwise paid. Swanson said: “The fact that customers almost always pay more under this program makes the companies’ statements about the programs misleading.” Although the PUC approved both the programs when they were initially offered, Swanson said: “It is hard to believe that the PUC would approve these programs today based on the information now available.”
The Attorney General’s investigation found that in almost every year the average participating customer has lost money. In 2005-06, CenterPoint customers participating in the No Surprise Bill program paid more than $12 million more than non-participating customers. In the same year, Xcel’s fixed billing customers paid 63% more than they would have if they had not participated in the program. The investigation also discovered that customers have not been permitted to exit the programs even though they are experiencing financial difficulties and customers have been confused by the disclosures and by statements made by the companies about the programs.
Swanson stated that her Office is particularly concerned that neither company provides customers with a side-by-side billing comparison so that customers can see whether they saved or lost money during the year before. Further, both companies automatically re-enroll customers year after year, and when customers call to complain, the utilities refuse to allow them to exit.
The complaint asks the PUC to reexamine both utilities’ programs in light of the new data uncovered by the Attorney General’s investigation. Swanson recommends that the PUC terminate the programs, or at a minimum alter the programs substantially to require Xcel and CenterPoint to provide consumers with more accurate information, including side-by-side billing comparisons, and to terminate the programs’ automatic re-enrollment feature.
Consumers who are concerned about how much they have paid under these programs may contact the Attorney General’s Office at (651) 296-3353 and the Public Utilities Commission at (651) 296-0406.
The Merrill Lynch Enron Government Conspiracy
The SEC summed the case this way, "Based on their substantial assistance to Enron, defendants aided and abetted Enron's violations of the federal securities laws." Merrill Lynch the firm settled with the SEC by agreeing to pay disgorgement, penalties, and interest of $80 million.
Siemens bribery investigation ends with a fine
Categories: Bribery & Corruption
The investigation into bribery allegations at Siemens AG ends with a fine and a charge for illegal profits. The company is paying the equivalent of $284 million in a case that prosecutors have referred to as Europe’s largest bribery investigation ever.
This part of the investigation is related to the company’s telecommunications-equipment unit. A former manager in this unit, Reinhard Siekaczek was indicted last week in connection with the bribery investigation, and has been accused of embezzling €24 million.
Siemens was fined earlier this year by a German court for bribery in the company’s power-generation unit in Italy. The company has also agreed to pay German authorities for unpaid taxes related to suspicious transactions.
This all began with an internal investigation that Siemens voluntarily began, which has now identified €1.6 billion in suspicious payments.
Authorities are still investigating other allegations against Siemens.
$1.2 Billion Dollar Fraud Scheme Alleged in Southern California
The law firm of Ackerman, Cowles & Lindsley filed a lawsuit against several real estate companies and professionals along with other purported investment groups. The suit alleges that some 400 or more investors were brought into a real estate "flipping" and "skimming" scheme operated by Jovane Investments, Stonewood Consulting, Inc., Pacific Wealth Management LLC (Nevada) and others. It is claimed that as many as 5000 residential home loans may go into foreclosure status within the next several months as a result of the alleged fraud.
Civil RICO Action Filed In $1.2B Interstate Real Estate and Currency Fraud Case: Many CA & AZ Military Personnel Alleged to be Victims
Late last week a civil RICO action was filed in the California Central District of the United States District Court. The suit is connected to another state court action filed earlier this year in Riverside, California. While both suits focus on what is alleged to be a $1.2B fraud on real estate and Iraqi dinar "investors," the RICO case highlights the alleged intensive use of federally regulated communications systems to perpetrate the alleged fraud throughout many states. It is alleged that the perpetrators of the fraud caused $1.2B in bad real estate loans, stole the identities of loan applicants to take out credit lines without victim permission, and that they failed to provided hundreds of millions of Iraqi dinars as promised….
Fraud in private health insurance should surprise no one
No one should be surprised that the U.S. private consulting firm, Aon Corp., whose Canadian subsidiary was hired by the Alberta government to look into the viability of expanding private health insurance, paid out a massive settlement in a fraud case. These kinds of settlements are not uncommon in the private health-insurance sector.
There is of course the obvious question of why the government would hire a private insurance company to assess the viability of increasing the role of private health insurance in Alberta. Is that not like hiring a fox to assess the security of the chicken coop?
However, focusing on the issue of fraud -- since Aon Corp. is American, as would be any likely private insurers contracted in the future -- it is reasonable to look south of the border for a clearer picture.
The American group Physicians for a National Health Program compiled the following list of recent criminal and civil fines and settlements by for-profit health-care insurance companies.
- NME (Tenet): $683 million for medicare billings fraud and patient abuse;
- Smith Kline, Corning, LabCorp: $800 million for billing fraud;
- Caremark: $137 million for kickbacks and fraud in the home IV business;
- Fresenius/NMC: $486 million for dialysis fraud;
- Roche and BASF: $725 million for a price-fixing cartel;
- Beverly: $175 million for nursing home fraud;
- Noll: $135 million for suppressing research data on drug Synthroid;
- Abbott Labs: $100 million for faulty lab test kits;
- Columbia/HCA: $745 million for alleged fraud in a continuing investigation.
We can now add Aon Corp. to this list: a $190-million settlement for alleged fraud and anti-competitive business practices.
There is more: the U.S. General Accounting Office reported that unauthorized insurance companies defrauded 15,000 employers and more than 200,000 policyholders of more than $200 million in unpaid claims between 2000 and 2002. Although these types of fraud hit private health payers and government-funded health plans most, all of us ultimately pay. These crimes result in higher health insurance premiums (or fewer benefits) for employers and individuals, and higher public health costs.
Nachshon Draiman and Multiut charged $15 million judgment
Honorable John A. Nordberg: Enter Memorandum Opinion and Order.
For the reasons set forth above, defendants motion for summary judgment is granted, and judgment is granted to plaintiff, and against defendants Multiut and Nachshon Draiman
Case 1:02-cv-07446 Document 228 Filed 06/11/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.2.1
Eastern Division
Dynegy Marketing and Trade
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 1:02−cv−07446
Hon. John A. Nordberg
Multiut Corporation, Nachshon Draiman, et al.
Defendant.
NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 11, 2008:
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John A. Nordberg:Enter Memorandum
Opinion and Order. For the reasons set forth above, defendants motion for summary judgment is granted, and judgment is granted to plaintiff, and against defendants Multiut and Nachshon Draiman, on Counts I and II of plaintiffs amended complaint, in the amount of
$15,348,244.72 plus interest accruing from October 1, 2004. Judgment is granted for plaintiff and against defendants on Counts I through VI of defendants
counterclaims.Status hearing set for 10/2/2008 at 2:30 PM. [183],[196]Mailed notice(tlp, )
ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
NACHSHON DRAIMAN 09-17582 and Multiut 09-17575 file for bankruptcy
ilnbke
09-17582
ilnbke
09-17575
On May 14, 2009, NACHSHON DRAIMAN filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The filer is being represented by Michael L Ralph, Sr of the firm Ralph, Schwab & Schiever, Chtd.
A bankruptcy petition preparer’s failure to comply with the provisions of
title 11 and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure may result in
fines or imprisonment or both 11 U.S.C. §110; 18 U.S.C. §156.
Multiut Corporation
/s/ SCOTT R. CLAR
SCOTT R. CLAR 06183741
Crane, Heyman, Simon, Welch & Clar
Suite 3705
135 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60603-4297
312-641-6777 Fax: 312-641-7114
May 14, 2009
Nachshon Draiman
/s/ Nachshon Draiman
President
May 14, 2009
I certify under penalty of perjury that the information provided above is true and correct.
Signature of Debtor: /s/ Nachshon Draiman
Nachshon Draiman
Date: May 14, 2009
Software
B4 (Official Form 4) (12/07)
United States Bankruptcy Court
Northern District of Illinois
In re Nachshon Draiman Case No.
Debtor(s) Chapter 11
LIST OF CREDITORS HOLDING 20 LARGEST UNSECURED CLAIMS
Following is the list of the debtor's creditors holding the 20 largest unsecured claims. The list is prepared in
accordance with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(d) for filing in this chapter 11 [or chapter 9] case. The list does not include (1)
persons who come within the definition of "insider" set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 101, or (2) secured creditors unless the value of
the collateral is such that the unsecured deficiency places the creditor among the holders of the 20 largest unsecured claims.
If a minor child is one of the creditors holding the 20 largest unsecured claims, state the child's initials and the name and
address of the child's parent or guardian, such as "A.B., a minor child, by John Doe, guardian." Do not disclose the child's
name. See 11 U.S.C. § 112; Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(m).
(1)
Name of creditor and complete
mailing address including zip
code
(2)
Name, telephone number and complete
mailing address, including zip code, of
employee, agent, or department of creditor
familiar with claim who may be contacted
(3)
Nature of claim (trade
debt, bank loan,
government contract,
etc.)
(4)
Indicate if claim is
contingent,
unliquidated,
disputed, or subject
to setoff
(5)
Amount of claim [if
secured, also state
value of security]
Alan Mandel
7520 N. Skokie Blvd.
Skokie, IL 60077
Alan Mandel
7520 N. Skokie Blvd.
Skokie, IL 60077
Attorney's Fees and
Costs
Disputed
Subject to Setoff
193,963.62
BankFinancial, F.S.B.
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Bank Financial
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Personal Line of
Credit
120,000.00
BankFinancial, F.S.B.
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Bank Financial
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Guaranty on Bank
Loan, Lifescan
Laboratiries, Inc.
Contingent
Unliquidated
259,748.58
BankFinancial, F.S.B.
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Bank Financial
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Guaranty on Bank
Loan, Peterson Park
Health Care Center
Contingent
Unliquidated
1,048,361.25
BankFinancial, F.S.B.
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Bank Financial
3443 W. Touhy Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Guaranty of Real
Estate Mortgage
Loan, Lifescan
Laboratiries, Inc.
Contingent
Unliquidated
859,670.31
Brickyard Bank
6676 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712-3631
Brickyard Bank
6676 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712-3631
Guaranty on Bank
Loan, Embassy
Holdings, LLC
Contingent
Unliquidated
2,200,000.00
Brickyard Bank
6676 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712-3631
Regina Hirn
Brickyard Bank
6676 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712-3631
847-979-2265
Personal line of
credit
677,251.85
Cole Taylor Bank
225 W. Washington St.
8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Jonathon Rothstein
Cole Taylor Bank
225 W. Washington St., 8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
312-442-5000
Guaranty of Bank
Loan LOC, LCF
Associates
Contingent
Unliquidated
400,000.00
Cole Taylor Bank
225 W. Washington St.
8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Cole Taylor Bank
225 W. Washington St., 8th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Guaranty of Real
Estate Mortgage
Loan, LCF
Associates
Contingent
Unliquidated
1,000,000.00
Danny Shabat
3531 W. Howard
Skokie, IL 60076
Danny Shabat
3531 W. Howard
Skokie, IL 60076
200,000.00
Software Copyright (c) 1996-2007 Best Case Solutions - Evanston, IL - (800) 492-8037 Best
B4 (Official Form 4) (12/07) - Cont.
In re Nachshon Draiman Case No.
Debtor(s)
LIST OF CREDITORS HOLDING 20 LARGEST UNSECURED CLAIMS
(Continuation Sheet)
(1)
Name of creditor and complete
mailing address including zip
code
(2)
Name, telephone number and complete
mailing address, including zip code, of
employee, agent, or department of creditor
familiar with claim who may be contacted
(3)
Nature of claim (trade
debt, bank loan,
government contract,
etc.)
(4)
Indicate if claim is
contingent,
unliquidated,
disputed, or subject
to setoff
(5)
Amount of claim [if
secured, also state
value of security]
Dynegy Marketing and Trade
1000 Louisiana
Suite 5800
Houston, TX 77002
Dynegy Marketing and Trade
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
Houston, TX 77002
Judgment Creditor -
Appeal Pending
Disputed 15,348,244.72
First Bank
900 East Higgins Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
First Bank
900 East Higgins Road
Elk Grove Village, IL 60007
Guaranty of Bank
Loan for now
inactive business,
Embassy Day Care
Center, Inc.
Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
800,000.00
Great-West Life & Annuity et al.
c/o Chittenden Murday Novotny
303 W. Madison #1400
Chicago, IL 60606
Great-West Life & Annuity et al.
c/o Chittenden Murday Novotny
303 W. Madison #1400
Chicago, IL 60606
Pending litigation -
health insurance
claims
Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
142,360.00
Greenberg Traurig
77 West Wacker Drive
Suite 2500
Chicago, IL 60601
Greenberg Traurig
77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 2500
Chicago, IL 60601
Attorneys' Fees and
Costs
Disputed
Subject to Setoff
827,310.10
Israel Discount Bank
Yehuda Halevy 27-31
POB 456
Tel Aviv , Israel, 65136
Israel Discount Bank
Yehuda Halevy 27-31, P.O. Box 456
Tel Aviv, Israel 65136
Pending Litigation Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
Subject to Setoff
25,000,000.00
Peterson Park
7520 Skokie Blvd.
Skokie, IL 60077
Peterson Park
7520 Skokie Blvd.
Skokie, IL 60077
Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
3,000,000.00
Premier Bank
1210 Central Avenue
Wilmette, IL 60091
Ginett Ramos
Premier Bank
1210 Central Avenue
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-920-1400
Guaranty on Bank
Loan, Embassy
Holdings, LLC
Contingent
Unliquidated
749,316.68
Robert Hartman
6633 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Robert Hartman
6633 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Loan - Business 200,000.00
Ron Shabat
5936 N. Bernard
Chicago, IL 60659
Ron Shabat
5936 N. Bernard
Chicago, IL 60659
750,000.00
Virginia Feddeler et al.
c/o Paul R. Shuldiner
20 S. Clark #500
Chicago, IL 60603
Virginia Feddeler et al.
c/o Paul R. Shuldiner
20 S Clark #500
Chicago, IL 60603
Pending litigation -
personal injury torte
claim
Contingent
Unliquidated
Disputed
3,000,100.00
Software Copyright (c) 1996-2007 Best Case Solutions - Evanston, IL - (800) 492-8037 Best Case Bankruptcy
B4 (Official Form 4) (12/07) - Cont.
In re Nachshon Draiman Case No.
Hello !.
You re, I guess , probably curious to know how one can make real money .
There is no need to invest much at first. You may start to get income with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.
AimTrust is what you need
AimTrust represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.
It is based in Panama with structures around the world.
Do you want to become an affluent person?
That`s your chance That`s what you really need!
I feel good, I started to get income with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to choose a proper companion who uses your money in a right way - that`s it!.
I take now up to 2G every day, and what I started with was a funny sum of 500 bucks!
It`s easy to join , just click this link http://qukamakyr.greatnow.com/jiqovy.html
and go! Let`s take this option together to become rich
Hi !.
You may , probably curious to know how one can collect a huge starting capital .
There is no need to invest much at first. You may start to get income with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.
AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
AimTrust represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.
It is based in Panama with structures everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.
Do you want to become an affluent person?
That`s your choice That`s what you really need!
I feel good, I started to get income with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to choose a correct companion who uses your savings in a right way - that`s the AimTrust!.
I take now up to 2G every day, and what I started with was a funny sum of 500 bucks!
It`s easy to start , just click this link http://kavizoca.freecities.com/qylehyz.html
and go! Let`s take our chance together to feel the smell of real money
I wish not acquiesce in on it. I regard as polite post. Specially the title attracted me to read the sound story.
Good day, sun shines!
There have were times of hardship when I felt unhappy missing knowledge about opportunities of getting high yields on investments. I was a dump and downright stupid person.
I have never imagined that there weren't any need in big starting capital.
Nowadays, I'm happy and lucky , I begin take up real income.
It's all about how to select a proper partner who utilizes your money in a right way - that is incorporate it in real deals, and shares the income with me.
You can ask, if there are such firms? I'm obliged to answer the truth, YES, there are. Please get to know about one of them:
http://theblogmoney.com
Nice fill someone in on and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you seeking your information.
Hi!
You may probably be very interested to know how one can make real money on investments.
There is no need to invest much at first.
You may commense earning with a sum that usually is spent
on daily food, that's 20-100 dollars.
I have been participating in one company's work for several years,
and I'm ready to let you know my secrets at my blog.
Please visit blog and send me private message to get the info.
P.S. I earn 1000-2000 per daily now.
http://theinvestblog.com [url=http://theinvestblog.com]Online Investment Blog[/url]
Hi everybody!
Let me introduce myself,
my name is Peter.
Generally I’m a venturesome analyst. all my life I’m carried away by online-casino and poker.
Not long time ago I started my own blog, where I describe my virtual adventures.
Probably, it will be interesting for you to find out my particular opinion on famous gambling projects.
Please visit my diary. http://allbestcasino.com I’ll be glad would you find time to leave your comments.
Good day!
Sure, you’ve heard about me, because my fame is running in front of me,
my parents call me Nikolas.
Generally I’m a social gmabler. for a long time I’m keen on online-casino and poker.
Not long time ago I started my own blog, where I describe my virtual adventures.
Probably, it will be interesting for you to read my notes.
Please visit my diary. http://allbestcasino.com I’ll be glad would you find time to leave your opinion.
buy levitra online canada
buy
Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it's really informative. I'm gonna watch
out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future.
Many people will be benefited from your writing.
Cheers!
My blog post - adoptions in georgia
I do trust all the ideas you've presented for your post. They're really
convincing and will certainly work. Still, the posts are too
brief for novices. Could you please lengthen them a
bit from subsequent time? Thank you for the post.
Here is my web-site ... right Hotmail support
Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in
the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to
work on. You have done a marvellous job!
Here is my blog puckcockers.com
Post a Comment